Criminals running free (28 Aug, 2017)

Have your say on today's Aardvark Daily column

Re: Criminals running free (28 Aug, 2017)

Postby aardvark_admin » Mon Aug 28, 2017 12:26 pm

Yes, *some* of his assets have been released... adding further evidence that they should never have been seized in the first place -- don't you think?

KD is rich... but just because he's rich, is that justification for authorities to have taken millions of dollars from him and deprived him of the opportunity to earn revenue from that capital?

I don't think so.
Site Admin
Posts: 3062
Joined: Wed May 07, 2014 2:10 pm

Re: Criminals running free (28 Aug, 2017)

Postby phill » Mon Aug 28, 2017 12:38 pm

its no biggie .. its just the realization that we have reached the same point with pollies and snivel servants that we already knew we had reached with elected local government and council employees
its the snivel service that makes the rules and the elected reps that get to tell the people when required what they are
why they dont have to obey them ( the briefing usually fails but the end result doesnt change )

kdk's biggest problem is he will be able to sue for an awful lot of millions and those numbers are hard to get around without tossing someone to the wolves
but the longer it can be stretched out the longer the leeches can stay stuck on the public purse and hopefully dismiss the final flogging with the moist bus ticket

so yeh .. no real point voting in the next one or anymore till its changed ... same manikin .. different makeup
and dont bother trying to fuk the manikin
it has a hidden penis especially for people who think they are doing that
( ,,,,,,,, ....... A E I O U use em sparingly theres probably not enough )
User avatar
Posts: 1451
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 8:31 pm

Re: Criminals running free (28 Aug, 2017)

Postby flyernzl » Mon Aug 28, 2017 8:18 pm

No Mandarin in the bureaucracy is going to order the prosecution of another.
Because, if and when at some later stage he puts a toe over the line, he can claim precedent in immunity.

Just the same as no member of the medical profession will go to court and give expert evidence against another MB ChB.
Birds of a feather, and all that.
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 6:50 pm


Return to Today's column

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Muscular Jam and 1 guest