Finally, drone collides with airliner? (16 Oct, 2017)

Have your say on today's Aardvark Daily column

Re: Finally, drone collides with airliner? (16 Oct, 2017)

Postby joeseph » Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:47 pm

aardvark_admin wrote:Are they annoying?

Josh Martin seems to think so... ... too-common

I guess it depends on what size it is & probably the prop design.
Posts: 96
Joined: Fri May 09, 2014 2:11 pm

Re: Finally, drone collides with airliner? (16 Oct, 2017)

Postby phill » Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:48 pm ... gal-again/ ... eden.8495/

strange to find a journalist that fails to research their articles before submitting them
( ,,,,,,,, ....... A E I O U use em sparingly theres probably not enough )
User avatar
Posts: 1353
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 8:31 pm

Re: Finally, drone collides with airliner? (16 Oct, 2017)

Postby Kiwiiano » Mon Oct 16, 2017 9:00 pm

aardvark_admin wrote:
Kiwiiano wrote:I suspect that the powers-that-be are scared that drones could so easily weaponised and would be very hard to deal with. So create a state of concern to justify draconian regulations.

Because nobody could ever weaponise a U-Hall truck by filling it with amonium nitrate and diesel then driving it to a Federal Building and detonating it... nah, that would never happen.

Try driving a U-haul truck thru the front door of the Beehive.... compared to the Cruise Missile described hereabouts. No wonder they're spooked!

....although that latest BOOOOM!!! on the news tonight suggests a truck on Bowen or Molesworth Streets could knock a severe dent in NZ's politicians. Yes, there are a lot of alternatives but don't include the US. As noted elsewhere, the claim "nothing can be done about it" comes from the only country where nothing is done about it.
~ Kiwiiano
“I'm right 98% of the time, so who gives a damn about the other 3%?"
User avatar
Posts: 350
Joined: Wed May 07, 2014 5:36 pm


Return to Today's column

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests