Yes, we are taking a risk (23 Aug, 2021)

Have your say on today's Aardvark Daily column

Re: Yes, we are taking a risk (23 Aug, 2021)

Postby Perry » Tue Aug 24, 2021 5:00 pm

aardvark_admin wrote:I watched an interesting video the other day from a doctor who said that the mRNA vaccines only . . .

My un-educated guess is that the assorted SARS COV 2 vaccines available are - in one way or another - genetically engineered. Do have that right?

If so, is that aspect being "hushed up?"
Perry
 
Posts: 1280
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 9:31 pm

Re: Yes, we are taking a risk (23 Aug, 2021)

Postby GCSBIntercepts » Thu Sep 02, 2021 1:57 pm

Correct. If you compare Medsafe and MPI's guidelines for in vitro and in vivo - these vaccines are technically, to the letter of the law, turning people into GMOs.
Don't blame me - that is the New Zealand government own laws.


And to all those that were silly enough to get vaccinated. especially for you!



https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defe ... ovid-shot/
GCSBIntercepts
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2021 3:43 pm

Re: Yes, we are taking a risk (23 Aug, 2021)

Postby aardvark_admin » Thu Sep 02, 2021 2:33 pm

GCSBIntercepts wrote:And to all those that were silly enough to get vaccinated. especially for you!

Yes, because a small number of people have died from the vaccine so it is really dangerous.

Much better to be one of the almost 5 million who have died from not having the vaccine eh?

Hey, I crunched the numbers and used the science rather than a phobia and desire to believe in conspiracies.

Plus I have the added bonus of better reception on my 5G phone since the jab and the prospect of an overnight firmware update that will turn me into a zombie!

Yeah, bring on the appocalypse!
aardvark_admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5181
Joined: Wed May 07, 2014 2:10 pm

Re: Yes, we are taking a risk (23 Aug, 2021)

Postby GCSBIntercepts » Thu Sep 02, 2021 2:54 pm

Maybe you can tell us how many have died from these vaccines?
Why don't you check the TGA database for Australia?

So what were your numbers Bruce? Which numbers did you use? Seriously?
But how can you get informed consent when you can't get the data?

Now you are being silly. Your phone and 5G won't turn you into a Zombie.

That's conspiracy theory nonsense!
GCSBIntercepts
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2021 3:43 pm

Re: Yes, we are taking a risk (23 Aug, 2021)

Postby aardvark_admin » Thu Sep 02, 2021 3:05 pm

GCSBIntercepts wrote:Now you are being silly. Your phone and 5G won't turn you into a Zombie.

Well that's a disappointment. If that's not going to happen then perhaps you're right, I shouldn't have gotten the vaccine. I was looking forward to being a zombie!
That's conspiracy theory nonsense!

I defer to your greater experience in the world of conspiracies.
aardvark_admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5181
Joined: Wed May 07, 2014 2:10 pm

Re: Yes, we are taking a risk (23 Aug, 2021)

Postby GCSBIntercepts » Fri Sep 03, 2021 12:02 pm

Bruce,

You used to be a smart guy. What happened?

https://apps.tga.gov.au/PROD/DAEN/daen-report.aspx

COMIRNATY COVID-19 vaccine (active ingredients: BNT162b2 (mRNA))
COVID-19 Vaccine (TNS) (active ingredients: COVID-19 Vaccine (Type not specified))
COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca (active ingredients: ChAdOx1-S (Viral vector))


3 medicines selected between 01/01/1971 - 20/08/2021.
Search results

The results are shown in two tabs.

Number of reports (cases): 50505

Number of cases with a single suspected medicine: 49773

Number of cases where death was a reported outcome: 473
GCSBIntercepts
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2021 3:43 pm

Re: Yes, we are taking a risk (23 Aug, 2021)

Postby GCSBIntercepts » Fri Sep 03, 2021 4:10 pm

So looking up the current numbers of vaccinated with the any of the vaccines, 7 million have had one dose, 12 million both.
Lets call that 10 million people - as a rule of thumb?

We shall use the 453 deaths, and round up to a conservative 500 as a number due to under reporting? By the time it actually gets through the system, you know? The Thing?

Now, using these conservative figures, that one death for every 20,000 patients? That is 1:20,000 people?

So what figures are you using Bruce?
These figures are from the TGA. This is not Medsafe, Pharmac, or some other PC Woke Fucked Up NZ government department. This is from a fully legally engaged governmental system.

So where are our missing dead Bruce? I can tell you exactly where they are. We Intercept.

Would you like me to tell everyone where these missing dead are?
And you shut down discussion with labels of 'Russians!, Conspiracy theorists! Whackos!'

Shame on you all!
This is on you. You need to take responsibility.
GCSBIntercepts
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2021 3:43 pm

Re: Yes, we are taking a risk (23 Aug, 2021)

Postby phill » Fri Sep 03, 2021 5:27 pm

nahhh
i want to take some of that responsibility as well
and if your figures are correct its more like 1/30k +
so we have
1/30k v 2/100 ... ( the 1/30k is likely to get worse soon .. the 2/100 is likely to skyrocket very shortly )
its going to take me awhile to figure out which one of these is the better
bear with me
i will get there
( ,,,,,,,, ....... A E I O U use em sparingly theres probably not enough )

i might live and eat in a sewer .. but hey look how many of these shiny things i have got
User avatar
phill
 
Posts: 2633
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 8:31 pm

Re: Yes, we are taking a risk (23 Aug, 2021)

Postby GCSBIntercepts » Sat Sep 04, 2021 2:56 pm

But Phil!

They are not my figures - but they are the Australian governments figures!
You go take it up with them? Or our government?

Some of you might be having that bunnied feeling by now? Well read on - you have been.

So where is Medsafes data? Come on Phil, think? How many deaths should we have had? And in the media - that you know about?
Where are the missing vaccine deaths?

You do realise they shut down trials with more than 2 per million deaths?

Yes, trials, the FDA did not grant status till recently, but Medsafe did? No - they didn't! Provisional. Pfizer has precious little time to provide statute data.

You are still part of a trial. A very interesting trial - which you were not given informed consent for.

Now, what do the S and Capsid protein do? Why are their prion like domains? Why would you knowingly choose these for a vaccine?
Why do real scientists complain that the capsid protein is a recognised conformation homology indicator for prion formation?
Why? Because they have brains. And they like to protect them.

https://www.fulcrumnews.com/blog/2021/6 ... f-all-time

If you took this vaccine, and there are more cases of CJD, and there will be, then you need to ameliorate your behaviour so as not to infect others.
I think we need to call this pCJD.
P for Pfizer.

PS: I can tell you exactly how the NZ government will handle this? Just like last time they exposed our population to iatrogenic medical prions, and there were hundred of CJD deaths.

PSS: Take the above information to your registered medical professional, or politician - and ask them for their opinion. Go on!
GCSBIntercepts
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2021 3:43 pm

Re: Yes, we are taking a risk (23 Aug, 2021)

Postby aardvark_admin » Sat Sep 04, 2021 2:58 pm

GCSBIntercepts wrote:But Phil!

They are not my figures - but they are the Australian governments figures!

LOL the Australian government -- they are to facts what the Daily Mail is to good journalism!
aardvark_admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5181
Joined: Wed May 07, 2014 2:10 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Today's column

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests